ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2026
Needs Assessment to Inform Future Development of the National Curriculum in Reproductive Psychiatry.
Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe National Curriculum in Reproductive Psychiatry (NCRP) was published in 2019 to address a critical gap in psychiatry residency didactic training. However, because the curriculum is available online, diverse users may access it. This study aimed to characterize NCRP users and assess their educational needs to inform future curriculum development.
methodsA survey was distributed in two phases: (1) via email to 845 registered NCRP users and (2) via social media and professional listservs. The survey assessed user profession, training level, primary reason for using NCRP, satisfaction, and interest in additional materials. Both quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed.
resultsIn phase 1, 198 of 845 NCRP users responded to the survey, yielding a response rate of 23%. Forty-two additional responses were received in phase two. Most respondents (81%) reported specializing in psychiatry, and 70% identified as physicians. Over half (56%) described themselves as independent users. Respondents reported high satisfaction with NCRP design and organization. Thematic analysis identified five key themes for improvement, focused on time constraints and content type.
conclusionsThough originally intended for psychiatry residency programs, the NCRP now also serves a broad, interdisciplinary audience including independent learners. These new users value its structure but would prefer shorter, multimedia-enhanced content. Limited protected time for reproductive psychiatry education, compounded by competing curricular priorities, remains the primary barrier to curriculum incorporation in residency programs. NCRP can advocate for additional integration into formal residency training while also developing flexible materials to support diverse, interdisciplinary learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41291303What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.