Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291259›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025

Congruent direction but different magnitude of biodiversity response to land-use intensification in space and time.

L Neuenkamp, H Saiz, N Schenk, M Fischer, N Blüthgen, M M Gossner, N Hoelzel, V H Klaus, T Kleinebecker, D Prati and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

L NeuenkampFaculty of Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. lena.neuenkamp@uni-bielefeld.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6108-5720
H SaizInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-2996
N SchenkInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
M FischerInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5589-5900
N BlüthgenDepartment of Biology, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6349-4528
M M GossnerForest Entomology, Swiss Federal Research Institute of Forest, Snow and Landscape Research, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
N HoelzelInstitute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
V H KlausForage Production and Grassland Systems, Agroscope, Zurich, Switzerland.
T KleinebeckerInstitute for Landscape Ecology and Resources Management, Research Centre for BioSystems, Land-Use and Nutrition, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-2861
D PratiInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
S SeiboldForest Zoology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Tharandt, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7968-4489
N SimonsApplied Biodiversity Science, Chair of Conservation Biology and Forest Ecology, Theodor-Boveri Institute, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-7050
W WeisserSchool of Life Sciences, Terrestrial Ecology Research Group, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-8959
E Allan *Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
C Penone *Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land-use intensification is considered a major driver of biodiversity loss. However, most evidence for land-use effects come from comparing biodiversity in areas differing in current land-use intensity. The robustness of such space-for-time substitutions in capturing temporal changes in biodiversity remains unclear. Here we compare spatial and temporal responses of plant and arthropod communities with changes in land-use intensity using 150 time series of 11 years each from German grasslands. We show that land-use intensification across both space and time resulted in a loss of plant and arthropod α- and β-diversity. The direction of biodiversity response, in both space and time, was generally similar, which supports the value of using spatial data to estimate temporal changes in biodiversity following land-use intensification. However, we find a smaller magnitude of response in α- and β-diversity over time, probably because temporal changes in land use were smaller than spatial ones and biodiversity may take several years to respond to changes in land-use intensity. Our research highlights the utility of space-for-time substitution approaches to approximate temporal trends in biodiversity but also calls for more standardized temporal data to capture delayed biodiversity responses and reliably measure the time course of biodiversity change.

Indexed as

AgricultureArthropodsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesGrasslandAnimalsGermanyPlantsTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.