ArticleNature ecology & evolution2025
Congruent direction but different magnitude of biodiversity response to land-use intensification in space and time.
Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Land-use intensification is considered a major driver of biodiversity loss. However, most evidence for land-use effects come from comparing biodiversity in areas differing in current land-use intensity. The robustness of such space-for-time substitutions in capturing temporal changes in biodiversity remains unclear. Here we compare spatial and temporal responses of plant and arthropod communities with changes in land-use intensity using 150 time series of 11 years each from German grasslands. We show that land-use intensification across both space and time resulted in a loss of plant and arthropod α- and β-diversity. The direction of biodiversity response, in both space and time, was generally similar, which supports the value of using spatial data to estimate temporal changes in biodiversity following land-use intensification. However, we find a smaller magnitude of response in α- and β-diversity over time, probably because temporal changes in land use were smaller than spatial ones and biodiversity may take several years to respond to changes in land-use intensity. Our research highlights the utility of space-for-time substitution approaches to approximate temporal trends in biodiversity but also calls for more standardized temporal data to capture delayed biodiversity responses and reliably measure the time course of biodiversity change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41291259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.