ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Current status and future directions for the use of artificial intelligence in pediatric critical care nephrology.
Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly improve the practice of medicine. However, its application in pediatric critical care nephrology remains underdeveloped. This scoping review investigates the current state of AI/machine learning (ML) algorithms developed and implemented in the field of pediatric critical care nephrology over more than two decades (2000-2024). We identified 24 articles related to commonly encountered pathologies including acute kidney injury (AKI), electrolyte and acid-base imbalances, fluid management, and dialysis. Twenty (80%) of these articles focused on AKI (prediction and/or detection) and only two articles (4%) investigated the impact of implemented AI/ML models on clinical care outcomes. However, significant limitations exist primarily because of the single-center study design and the need for external validation. Other challenges impeding the broader application of AI/ML models in pediatric critical care nephrology include: (1) the heterogeneity of patient diseases, organ maturation, and age-based norms within pediatrics, necessitating larger datasets that have only recently been developed; (2) lack of portability of algorithms across different settings and electronic health records; and (3) limited scalability due to varying computational and bioinformatics infrastructure and the absence of standardized regulations, which hinder further external validation and implementation of data pipelines. In pediatric critical care nephrology, there remains a significant gap between the development of AI/ML models and their implementation/application at the bedside. Closing this gap will require a concerted and collaborative effort across multiple stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41291255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.