ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning pipeline for detecting vestibular schwannoma patients with unilateral vestibular loss based on kinematic data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting subtle balance and coordination impairments in individuals with vestibular schwannomas (VS) remains a challenge, particularly when traditional clinical assessments appear normal. Focusing on patients prior to surgical intervention, this study offers a unique opportunity to capture early motor adaptations before permanent vestibular loss. We developed a deep learning-based classifier to distinguish VS patients from age-matched healthy controls using kinematic data collected during standardized gait tasks. Participants performed a short-duration (< 10 s) straight-path walk at a normal pace (an item from the Functional Gait Assessment) and a 30-second walk with intermittent eye closure. Six inertial measurement units (IMUs) were placed at different body locations, and models were trained using data from each sensor independently. We employed a convolutional neural network (CNN) tailored to this clinical application. The classifier achieved a maximum accuracy of 0.74 for controls and 0.71 for VS patients. Notably, the model detected early-stage compensatory movement patterns-even in the absence of clinical score differences-by extracting features from wrist and trunk sensors, regions not emphasized in standard evaluations. Performance improved with dataset size, particularly with more subjects, highlighting the value of broader data collection in clinical machine learning. Pretraining on external datasets that included both healthy and pathological subjects further improved accuracy, underscoring the importance of dataset diversity. These findings demonstrate the potential of deep learning to detect functional impairment when clinical scoring falls short and provide practical guidance for sensor placement, dataset design, and model training in vestibular and balance disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.