Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291186›Full record

SynthesisOral radiology2026

Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for facial fracture detection: a systematic review.

Nozimjon Tuygunov, Shukhrat A Boymuradov, Zohaib Khurshid, Siriporn Songsiripradubboon, Jamshid Abdulahtov, Ulugbek Khatamov

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nozimjon TuygunovDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan. nozimtuygunov@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0000-9781-1755
Shukhrat A BoymuradovDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Zohaib KhurshidDepartment of Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Siriporn SongsiripradubboonDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jamshid AbdulahtovDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tashkent State Medical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Ulugbek KhatamovDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models for detecting facial bone fractures on computed tomography (CT), cone-beam CT (CBCT), and plain radiographs.

methodsOriginal studies applying machine learning or deep learning algorithms for facial fracture detection in humans were included if they reported diagnostic accuracy metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, or area under the curve (AUC). PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched up to June 3, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251085644).

resultsA total of 23 studies were included. Object detection models such as YOLOv5 and Faster R-CNN-demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in localizing facial fractures. Classification models such as ResNet and Swin Transformer achieved AUCs frequently exceeding 0.90. Segmentation and hybrid frameworks further improved anatomical specificity. However, the generalizability of findings was constrained by predominantly retrospective, single-centre study designs, limited sample sizes, inconsistent annotation practices, and the absence of external or prospective validation.

conclusionAI models show high diagnostic performance for detecting facial fractures across multiple anatomical regions and imaging modalities. Further multicentre prospective studies and the integration of explainable AI are essential for clinical adoption. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: AI-assisted diagnostic models have the potential to enhance facial fracture detection accuracy, especially in emergency and resource-limited settings. Their integration into radiology workflows could reduce interpretation time, support less experienced clinicians, and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFacial BonesSkull FracturesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningHumansSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networksCT imagingDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyFacial bone fractures

Identifiers

PMID41291186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.