ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
Patient and Parent Perceptions of Disorders of Sex Development Terminology: A Pilot Study.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnostic terminology used for disorders of sex development (DSD) has been controversial even before the introduction of the umbrella term at the 2006 International Consensus Conference on Intersex. Agreement on nomenclature can enhance communication among clinicians, researchers, patients, and their families. However, disagreements over the implications of nomenclature can also result in a proliferation of terms contributing to confusion. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the connotative meaning assigned by adolescent patients with a DSD and parents to the terms used to describe their medical condition. In a sample of 27 adolescents/young adults with a DSD and 22 of their parents/caregivers recruited from three pediatric medical centers in mid-West and mid-Atlantic states, a semantic rating scale measuring self-esteem was used to characterize the connotative meaning ascribed to the person's specific diagnosis (or anatomical phenotype), the umbrella terms "disorders of sex development," "intersex," and "yourself"/"your child." Youth and parents rated themselves or their children more positively compared to how they rated either the specific diagnosis, the umbrella terms DSD or intersex. The ratings for the latter three terms were generally neutral and did not significantly differ from each other. These pilot findings suggest that neither youth with DSD nor their parents equate the person with their diagnosis. They also evaluated the person more positively than any of the diagnostic or umbrella terms rated. In contrast with previous studies assessing "preferences" for particular terms, this study suggests a novel strategy for assessing the personal "meanings" ascribed to each.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.