ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Incidence and risk factors for graft failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graft failure (GF) is a barrier to successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis for GF after allo-HSCT for MF. Two hundred and eleven patients with MF who underwent allo-HSCT across 32 hematology centers in China between December 2008 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 66 underwent matched sibling donor HSCT, 127 haploidentical HSCT, and 18 unrelated donor HSCT. The overall GF incidence was 12.5%. GF incidence was significantly associated with donor type (matched sibling, 4.8%; alternative, 13.3%; P = 0.024). Pretransplant massive splenomegaly increased GF incidence (non-massive splenomegaly, 8.5%; massive, 18.5%; P = 0.034). In multivariate analysis, massive splenomegaly (HR = 3.047; P = 0.007) and alternative donors (HR = 3.528; P = 0.041) increased GF risk. With median follow-up of 734 days, 3-year OS, DFS, relapse rate and NRM was 65.5%, 60.8%, 10.1% and 27.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed pretransplant splenomegaly reduced 3-year DFS (HR = 1.671; P = 0.025), and alternative donors reduced 3-year OS (HR = 2.033; P = 0.015). In conclusion, Allo-HSCT provides curative outcomes for MF patients. However, GF remains a significant challenge, particularly in haploidentical HSCT and those with massive pretransplant splenomegaly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41291115What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.