ArticleScientific reports2025
pH-stimuli-responsive doxorubicin release and stability in chitosan-Eudragit nanocarriers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sialic acid-modified phosphorene for low-necrosis and targeted drug delivery in breast cancer.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Lab-on-a-Chip and Microfluidics Technologies for Nano Drug Delivery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of pH-responsive nanocarriers in targeted cancer therapy hinges on their stability in circulation (pH 7.4) and controlled drug release in the acidic tumor microenvironment (pH ~ 5-6.5). This study elucidates the molecular mechanism of doxorubicin (DOX) interaction with and release from chitosan–Eudragit nanocarriers using integrated all-atom (AA-MD) and coarse-grained (CG-MD) molecular dynamics simulations. Our simulations reveal a stark contrast in behavior between neutral (pH 7) and acidic (pH 5) conditions. At pH 7, the system exhibits remarkable stability, characterized by a lower average RMSD (5.25 nm vs. 5.84 nm at pH 5) and significantly stronger drug-carrier binding. This is evidenced by an approximately three-fold larger drug-nanocarrier contact surface area and a > 50% higher number of stabilizing hydrogen bonds compared to acidic conditions. The protonation of ionizable groups at pH 5 induces electrostatic repulsion, leading to nanocarrier deformation, a drastic reduction in interactions, and ultimately, DOX release. The consistency of these findings across both AA-MD and CG-MD simulations validates the robustness of our models. This work provides a fundamental molecular-level understanding of the pH-responsive behavior of chitosan–Eudragit carriers, confirming their high potential for targeted DOX delivery and establishing a computational framework for the rational design of next-generation smart nanocarriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.