ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated segmentation of the fibula from CT imaging using two-stepped deep learning in 3D U-Net architectures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a fully automatic segmentation of the fibula bone from CT images for application in pre-operative planning of reconstructive surgery. The objective is to make use of new developments in the image segmentation field to optimize and reduce the costs of patient-specific surgery planning. Two different approaches are proposed to perform the fibula bone segmentation, both based on a two-step segmentation method using a 3D-UNet architecture. To account for the symmetry of the left and right fibula bones, input images of the right fibula are mirrored to the left side. The accuracy of the trained models is measured using common evaluation metrics, together with specific metrics focused on facial reconstructive surgery. Both of the described approaches achieve high-accuracy results. For the best-trained model, an average Dice score of 0.95 and Average Surface Distances below 0.31 mm is measured on the test set in the region of interest for the surgery. Both approaches are robust segmentation techniques and permit data pre-processing for further application in the context of preoperative surgical planning of procedures for facial reconstruction with bony transplants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.