Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41291015›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Estimating the realised economic value of a historic Mediterranean fruit fly eradication.

David A Rolls, John M Kean, Alan Flynn, Tom Kompas, Andrew P Robinson

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David A RollsCEBRA, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
John M KeanNew Zealand Institute for Bioeconomy Science Limited, 19 Ellesmere Junction Road, Lincoln, 7608, New Zealand. john.kean@agresearch.co.nz.
Alan FlynnAuckland Branch of the Entomological Society of New Zealand, Avondale, Auckland, 0600, New Zealand.
Tom KompasCEBRA, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Andrew P RobinsonCEBRA, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

Funding

AgResearch Limited Better Border Biosecurity (B3)Australian Government CEBRA Grant ProgramNew Zealand's Biological Heritage SO3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosecurity decision-making typically weighs up predicted future outcomes and impacts, but only rarely do we look back to assess and learn from historical decisions. Here, we quantified the contemporary benefits realised from a successful biosecurity action informed by over 100 years of subsequent economic data. New Zealand's 1907-08 eradication of invading Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly) incursions facilitated ongoing access to premium fresh fruit markets. Our results estimate cumulative losses to 2020 for apple and kiwifruit exports, had medfly not been eradicated, at 7.6 to 10.2 billion NZD 2022 equivalent. The greatest economic harm would have been loss of market access for kiwifruit exports, which did not even begin until seventy years after the 1907-08 eradications. This example demonstrates massive time-lagged benefits from a biosecurity action and informs the long-term considerations that biosecurity managers regularly face in deciding how to respond to incursions of exotic organisms.

Indexed as

Ceratitis capitataFruitInsect ControlActinidiaAnimalsHistory, 20th CenturyMalusNew Zealand

Identifiers

PMID41291015
PMCPMC12749411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.