ArticleScientific reports2025
Accurate and efficient P-values for rank-based independence tests with clustered data using a saddlepoint approximation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Saddlepoint inference for rank-based k-sample tests in clustered survival trials.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate statistical inference for clustered data-common in multi-center clinical trials and longitudinal studies-poses significant challenges due to within-cluster correlation. Rank-based tests like the logrank, Wilcoxon, and Datta-Satten are valued for robustness but often suffer inflated Type I error rates under standard asymptotic approximations. While exact permutation tests offer theoretical accuracy, they are computationally impractical for large datasets, highlighting a methodological gap. This paper proposes a double saddlepoint approximation framework to deliver accurate p-values and confidence intervals for a wide class of rank-based tests. The method is built on a novel permutation distribution reformulation via block urn design, which preserves cluster integrity. This reformulation enables the test statistic's distribution to be represented as a sum of independent conditional random variables, from which a joint cumulant generating function can be derived for saddlepoint computation. The approach supports analyses with right-censored survival data and tied ranks. Extensive simulations confirm that the saddlepoint method accurately controls Type I error rates, performing identically to permutation-based benchmarks but with a vast reduction in computational cost. A case study on clinical trial data demonstrates the practical importance of this accuracy, showing how our approach avoids a potential false-positive conclusion reported by the standard asymptotic method. Ultimately, this research provides biostatisticians with a tool that is at once practical, efficient, and statistically rigorous for analyzing clustered data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.