ArticleScientific reports2025
Detect pre-cancerous tongue lesions for early oral cancer diagnosis using deep learning algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precancerous tongue lesion is a prevalent, complex, and highly perilous kind of cancer. The tumour might be in the salivary glands, tonsils, neck, cheek, and mouth. Oral Cancer (OC) is commonly identified in advanced stages due to the limited accuracy of available screening methods for early detection despite their significant potential to reduce mortality rates. The study exclusively examines lesions that specifically manifest on the tongue. This work demonstrates that one of the deep learning (DL) such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) based models employed are novel in their capacity to effectively identify OC, primarily due to the limited research conducted in this field. The research utilizes a specifically created dataset due to the absence, to the best of our knowledge, of any existing information on tongue lesions occurring in the oral cavity. The research recommends using various methods, such as DenseNet121, DenseNet169, DenseNet201, MobileNet, MobileNetV2, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, EfficientNetV2B0, EfficientNetV2B1, EfficientNetV2B2, EfficientNetV2B3, Inception, AlexNet, and transfer learning, to enhance our ability to diagnose OC. The effectiveness of the enhanced technique is assessed based on customized data. The study's input parameters consist of a portrait of the patient's tongue. according to the assessed outcomes of training precision, validation precision, training loss, and validation loss. The outcome indicated that VGG16 achieved the highest performance based on the given parameters. It demonstrated a vital training accuracy of 97.66% and a commendable validation accuracy of 89.06%. The study's Clinical trial number not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.