ArticleScientific reports2025
Outcomes of sequential therapy for advanced upper tract urothelial cancer and bladder cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multicenter retrospective study compared clinical outcomes and sequential therapy patterns between upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder cancer (BC). Data from 517 patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2021 at 54 Japanese institutions were analysed (232 UTUC, 285 BC). UTUC patients were more likely to have poor renal function and metastases to the lung, liver. Multivariate analysis identified UTUC as an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS). UTUC showed significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and lower response rates to first-line chemotherapy than BC (28.9% vs. 38.2%). These findings persisted after propensity score matching. OS following second-line therapy was also inferior in UTUC, although the rate of transition to second-line therapy was similar between groups. However, a higher proportion of UTUC patients (47.9%) could not proceed to third-line therapy, mainly due to disease progression or adverse events. Overall, UTUC was associated with a worse prognosis than BC. These results highlight the urgent need for more effective first-line treatments, such as immune-combination therapies, particularly in synchronous UTUC cases. ・Keywords: bladder cancer, chemotherapy, prognosis, sequential therapy, upper urinary tract urothelial cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.