Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290935›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Outcomes of sequential therapy for advanced upper tract urothelial cancer and bladder cancer.

Manato Kanesaka, Tomokazu Sazuka, Yuki Kita, Hideo Fukuhara, Naoto Takaoka, Yusuke Sugino, Yuto Matsushita, Keiichiro Mori, Kenji Ieda, Yosuke Shimizu and 11 more

Abstract readClinical StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Manato KanesakaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Tomokazu SazukaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan. tomo1ata2@yahoo.co.jp.
Yuki KitaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hideo FukuharaDepartment of Urology, Kochi University Graduate School of Medicine, Kochi, Japan.
Naoto TakaokaDepartment of Urology, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Yusuke SuginoDepartment of Urology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Yuto MatsushitaDepartment of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Keiichiro MoriDepartment of Urology, Jikei University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji IedaDepartment of Urology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yosuke ShimizuDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Toshiki AnamiDepartment of Urology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kazunari TsuchihashiDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital, Otsu, Japan.
Mizuki KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Shuichi TataranoDepartment of Urology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Makito MiyakeDepartment of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
Yoshiyuki MatsuiDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takahiro KimuraDepartment of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. selecao@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Tomohiko IchikawaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multicenter retrospective study compared clinical outcomes and sequential therapy patterns between upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder cancer (BC). Data from 517 patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2021 at 54 Japanese institutions were analysed (232 UTUC, 285 BC). UTUC patients were more likely to have poor renal function and metastases to the lung, liver. Multivariate analysis identified UTUC as an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS). UTUC showed significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and lower response rates to first-line chemotherapy than BC (28.9% vs. 38.2%). These findings persisted after propensity score matching. OS following second-line therapy was also inferior in UTUC, although the rate of transition to second-line therapy was similar between groups. However, a higher proportion of UTUC patients (47.9%) could not proceed to third-line therapy, mainly due to disease progression or adverse events. Overall, UTUC was associated with a worse prognosis than BC. These results highlight the urgent need for more effective first-line treatments, such as immune-combination therapies, particularly in synchronous UTUC cases. ・Keywords: bladder cancer, chemotherapy, prognosis, sequential therapy, upper urinary tract urothelial cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41290935
PMCPMC12647612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.