ArticleScientific reports2025
Willingness to engage in marine conservation through eDNA-informed citizen science on whale-watching platforms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine biodiversity faces challenges due to climate change, pollution, and human activities. Conservation efforts are often constrained by limited resources and public disengagement. This study evaluates the potential benefits of incorporating environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and citizen science into whale-watching tours to raise environmental awareness and promote marine conservation. A Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating attitudes, knowledge, and willingness to contribute to conservation through financial support, behavioral changes, and volunteering was administered to 224 participants across the Pelagos Sanctuary (Italy), the Azores (Portugal), and Skjálfandi Bay (Iceland). Environmental awareness, interest in environmental DNA (eDNA), and higher education levels were identified as significant predictors of willingness to pay (WTP). Conversely, higher ticket prices negatively impacted financial commitment. The majority of respondents reported an increased awareness of marine biodiversity and eDNA, along with a strong sense of personal responsibility toward marine protection. The study outlined various participant profiles, indicating how age, education, and ecotourism experience influence conservation attitudes. Specifically, younger individuals who are highly educated and have prior whale-watching experience were more inclined to provide financial support and engage in citizen science activities. These findings demonstrate that integrating citizen science-based activities and environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, into whale-watching tours is an effective way to foster meaningful pro-environmental engagement. This model presents a scalable and cost-effective approach to enhancing public participation in marine conservation and biodiversity monitoring, with potential applications extending to broader marine governance and ecotourism settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.