ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of reflective diaries guided by Kolbs experiential learning theory on learning engagement and academic emotions in nursing undergraduates a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning engagement and academic emotions are critical factors influencing the academic performance of university students. Previous studies have shown that undergraduate nursing students generally exhibit lower levels of learning engagement, along with a higher prevalence of negative low-arousal academic emotions compared to their non-nursing peers. This study aimed to examine the effects of reflective diary writing on learning engagement and academic emotions among undergraduate nursing students. A quasi-experimental design was adopted, with the entire cohort of nursing students enrolled in 2020 at a selected university serving as participants. Following a four-week instructional period, a reflective diary writing intervention was implemented. Changes in learning engagement and academic emotions were assessed using validated questionnaires before and after the intervention. The results indicated a significant improvement in learning engagement post-intervention (t = - 9.92, 95% CI [- 4.36, - 2.89], p < .001, d = 1.24). Regarding academic emotions, significant increases were observed in both positive activity orientation (t = - 8.64, 95% CI [- 1.90, - 1.18], p < .001, d = 1.07) and positive outcome orientation (t = - 6.42, 95% CI [- 1.12, - 0.59], p < .001, d = 0.80). Conversely, significant reductions were found in negative activity orientation (t = 5.74, 95% CI [1.11, 2.31], p < .001, d = - 0.71) and negative outcome orientation (t = 4.35, 95% CI [0.81, 2.19], p < .001, d = - 0.54). In conclusion, reflective diary writing effectively enhances learning engagement, promotes positive academic emotions, and reduces negative emotions among nursing students. These findings support the use of reflective diary writing as an evidence-based educational intervention in nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.