Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290896›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effects of delay on objective memory and on the subjective experience of forgetting.

Zohar Raz Groman, Talya Sadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zohar Raz GromanDepartment of Industrial Engineering & Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel. zohargro@post.bgu.ac.il.
Talya SadehDepartment of Industrial Engineering & Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 2055/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen a revived interest in the study of delay-dependent forgetting, with compelling evidence that episodic memories associated with contextual information are susceptible to delay-dependent forgetting. In addition, studies have shown that while the accessibility of memories associated with contextual information declines over time, there is little or no change in the memories' precision and quality. Building on these findings, the current study focuses on a fundamental question regarding memories associated with contextual information, which has received scant attention: What is the subjective experience accompanying forgetting of such memories? In two experiments, we found that, in line with previous results, the accessibility of memories associated with contextual information declined following a delay, but there was little or no detrimental effect of time on the quality of the memory representations. In contrast, subjective measures of memory showed substantial decrement over time. These results are interpreted in terms of the cues that drive subjective memory ratings following a delay. Such cues include the effort of retrieval, which increases over time, even when the retrieved representation does not change (or changes only slightly), as well as subjective theories of forgetting, which may not reflect that some aspects of memory show little or no forgetting over time.

Indexed as

MemoryMemory, EpisodicMental RecallAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung AdultContextual memoriesDelay-dependent forgettingEpisodic memoryFree recallMetacognition

Identifiers

PMID41290896
PMCPMC12647853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.