ArticleScientific reports2025
Overburden movement laws in thin bedrock workfaces under thick backfilled loose bodies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A detailed investigation was conducted on the geological conditions of thin bedrock workfaces under thick backfilled loose bodies in the first panel of the 22-upper coal seam at Shigetai Coal Mine. Utilizing both physical similarity modeling and numerical simulation techniques, the study comprehensively examined the overburden movement patterns and failure characteristics under these conditions. The physical simulation results indicate that as the working face approaches the open-pit slope area, the height of overburden failure gradually increases. When the thin bedrock becomes unstable due to rotation, unconsolidated materials at the slope base flow into the goaf. Subsequently, roof-cutting pressure on the thin bedrock causes simultaneous movement of backfilled loose bodies at different heights, resulting in minor surface settlement. As mining progresses, fracturing alternates periodically between roof-cutting and relief phases, ultimately expanding the surface subsidence zone. The maximum subsidence of the thin bedrock remains less than the mining height of the coal seam. Numerical simulations reveal that when the working face leaves the open-pit slope, the overburden failure height rises rapidly. Upon entering the thin bedrock workface area, advanced fractures develop, and the thin bedrock undergoes full-thickness fracturing in small cycles with intervals of approximately 10 m. The advanced stress fluctuates around the original rock stress, and the movement of backfilled loose bodies quickly reaches the surface. When re-entering the open-pit slope, the development of advanced fractures ceases, and the overburden failure height increases again. The advanced stress gradually rises and stabilizes in the waste dump area. Subsidence in the thin bedrock workface area consistently exceeds that in the open-pit slope area. Maximum subsidence values at different measurement heights are observed within the thin bedrock zone and shift toward the slope base as height increases. When exiting the slope, subsidence in the open-pit area is greater than when entering it. This research elucidates the dynamic fracturing mechanisms and movement patterns of overburden in thin bedrock workfaces beneath thick backfilled loose bodies, providing a theoretical foundation for safe mining in similar geological settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.