ArticleScientific reports2025
Tree-based learning for high-fidelity prediction of chaos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting three-dimensional chaotic systems with four qubit quantum systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forecasting chaotic systems using machine learning has become highly sought after due to its potential applications in predicting climate and weather phenomena, stock market indices, and pathological activity in biomedical signals. However, existing solutions, such as neural network-based reservoir computing (RC) and long-short-term memory (LSTM), contain numerous model hyperparameters that must be tuned, often requiring high computational resources and large training datasets. Here, we propose a computationally simpler regression tree ensemble-based technique to predict the temporal evolution of chaotic systems in data-driven environments. Furthermore, we introduce a heuristic procedure to prescribe hyperparameters through automated statistical analysis of training data, which eliminates the need for the user to perform hyperparameter tuning. We investigate the efficacy of the proposed hyperparameter prescription procedure through numerical experiments. Lastly, we demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of our proposed approach on several benchmark tasks, including the Southern Oscillation Index, a crucial but noisy climate time series with limited samples, to illustrate its effectiveness in real-world settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.