Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290872›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Soil health assessment and ecological risks associated with a tungsten-rich Scheelite mining site in a Brazilian semiarid region.

Kaio G V Garcia, Murilo S Almeida, Thais S Martins, Francisco L A Barbosa, Crisanto D Teixeira Filho, Ademir S F Araujo, Arthur P A Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaio G V GarciaDepartment of Soil Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. kaiovieira@ufc.br.
Murilo S AlmeidaDepartment of Soil Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Thais S MartinsDepartment of Soil Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Francisco L A BarbosaDepartment of Soil Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Crisanto D Teixeira FilhoDepartment of Soil Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ademir S F AraujoAgricultural Science Center, Federal University of Piaui, Teresina, Piaui, Brazil.
Arthur P A PereiraDepartment of Soil Science, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mining activities can severely impact soil health and ecosystem balance, particularly through metal contamination. This study investigated the effects of metals on microbial and enzymatic activity, alongside ecological risks in tungsten-rich Scheelite mining areas in semiarid Brazil. Three land use systems were selected, representing tailings (~ 30 years deposited), degraded (vegetation removal and machinery impact), and native vegetation (reference). Soil contamination by tungsten (W) and other metals, ecological risk indices, microbial properties, enzymatic activity, and stoichiometry were assessed. Higher concentrations of W, Cd, Mo, and Pb were found in tailings, whereas Cr and Zn were more abundant in degraded soils compared to the native system. Although most Cu, Cd, and Pb concentrations were within or close to the ranges commonly reported for non-polluted soils, the geoaccumulation and ecological risk indices indicated moderate to high potential environmental risks, mainly associated with W and Cd, particularly in tailings. Soil respiration and microbial biomass carbon were reduced by up to 51.82% and 79.65%, respectively, in tailings compared to native vegetation. Enzymatic activities of β-glucosidase, urease, arylsulfatase, and alkaline phosphatase declined by 82.8%, 69.2%, 93.5%, and 62%, respectively, in tailings, and by 27.9%, 59.6%, 59.5%, and 28% in degraded soils, while acid phosphatase activity increased by 276.6% in degraded sites compared to tailings. C: N and C: P ratios decreased under tailings, whereas N: P ratios increased. Our findings highlight mining's impact on soil health due to W contamination and offer new insights for managing ecology in these areas.

Indexed as

MiningSoilSoil PollutantsTungstenBrazilEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringMetals, HeavyRisk AssessmentSoil MicrobiologyMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsTungstenBioindicatorContamination riskMicrobial activitySoil enzymesTungsten-affected soil

Identifiers

PMID41290872
PMCPMC12647868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.