ArticleScientific reports2025
Soil health assessment and ecological risks associated with a tungsten-rich Scheelite mining site in a Brazilian semiarid region.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mining activities can severely impact soil health and ecosystem balance, particularly through metal contamination. This study investigated the effects of metals on microbial and enzymatic activity, alongside ecological risks in tungsten-rich Scheelite mining areas in semiarid Brazil. Three land use systems were selected, representing tailings (~ 30 years deposited), degraded (vegetation removal and machinery impact), and native vegetation (reference). Soil contamination by tungsten (W) and other metals, ecological risk indices, microbial properties, enzymatic activity, and stoichiometry were assessed. Higher concentrations of W, Cd, Mo, and Pb were found in tailings, whereas Cr and Zn were more abundant in degraded soils compared to the native system. Although most Cu, Cd, and Pb concentrations were within or close to the ranges commonly reported for non-polluted soils, the geoaccumulation and ecological risk indices indicated moderate to high potential environmental risks, mainly associated with W and Cd, particularly in tailings. Soil respiration and microbial biomass carbon were reduced by up to 51.82% and 79.65%, respectively, in tailings compared to native vegetation. Enzymatic activities of β-glucosidase, urease, arylsulfatase, and alkaline phosphatase declined by 82.8%, 69.2%, 93.5%, and 62%, respectively, in tailings, and by 27.9%, 59.6%, 59.5%, and 28% in degraded soils, while acid phosphatase activity increased by 276.6% in degraded sites compared to tailings. C: N and C: P ratios decreased under tailings, whereas N: P ratios increased. Our findings highlight mining's impact on soil health due to W contamination and offer new insights for managing ecology in these areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.