Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290863›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

AutoXAI: a meta-learning approach for recommendation of explanation techniques.

Radwa El Shawi, Leila Jamel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radwa El ShawiInstitute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. radwa.elshawi@ut.ee.
Leila JamelDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The absence of a universally optimal global explanation technique for machine learning models presents a significant challenge in ensuring interpretability across diverse tasks and domains. Existing methods vary in their strengths and limitations, and selecting the most suitable technique often requires manual trial-and-error, which is inefficient and prone to bias. This study introduces AutoXAI, a meta-learning framework designed to automate the recommendation of global explanation techniques for supervised learning tasks on tabular data. The framework aims to optimize interpretability by aligning recommendations with user-defined quantitative metrics. AutoXAI leverages optimal transport tos identify datasets with similar underlying distributions and applies multi-objective optimization to select explanation methods that best satisfy the chosen metrics. The framework currently supports four widely adopted model-agnostic techniques: LIME, Anchor, RuleFit, and RuleMatrix. AutoXAI was evaluated across 21 benchmark datasets, where its recommendations matched the best-performing explanation techniques in 19 cases. Comparative analysis against static heuristics demonstrated superior performance. Robustness experiments showed that AutoXAI maintained consistent recommendations under noise perturbations in over 90% of scenarios, confirming its reliability. AutoXAI offers a scalable, data-driven solution for selecting explanation techniques, reducing manual effort and enhancing trust in model decisions. Its adaptability to user preferences and resilience to noise make it a promising tool for real-world deployment, including critical domains such as healthcare and intrusion detection systems.

Identifiers

PMID41290863
PMCPMC12647740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.