ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction of an evaluation index system for core literacy in physical education and health for Chinese college students.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under the "Sports Powerhouse" and "Healthy China" initiatives, this study aims to establish an evaluation index system for core literacy in physical education and health for Chinese college students. This system will provide standards for developing core literacy among college students, promoting their physical and mental well-being and lifelong healthy living, and enhancing their comprehensive literacy. Qualitative text analysis was employed to examine the collected literature, and an initial indicator system was drafted based on expert interview feedback. The Delphi method was used to screen and refine the indicators through two rounds of expert surveys, ultimately constructing the evaluation indicator system. The analytic hierarchy process was applied to calculate the weight of each indicator. University administrators responsible for creating public physical education curricula were asked to provide an initial evaluation of the viability and surface validity of the indicator system in their own institutional contexts using a questionnaire survey method. (1) The evaluation index system for core literacy in physical education and health for Chinese college students comprises three primary indicators-athletic ability, healthy behaviors, and sports ethics-along with 15 secondary indicators and 45 tertiary indicators. (2) The weight coefficients for the primary indicators are as follows: sports ethics and character (0.3857) > healthy behaviors (0.3570) > athletic ability (0.2573). (3) According to the evaluation results from 16 leaders in charge of creating university physical education curricula, 100% and 93.75% of the leaders, respectively, believe that the evaluation indicators help students develop their core abilities. Leaders from different levels of institutions show variances in their scores. This study establishes a set of evaluation index system for core literacy in physical education and health among Chinese college students. It provides a scientific benchmark for measuring and cultivating these competencies, thereby enhancing the quality of physical education curricula in higher education institutions and promoting the holistic development of college students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.