ArticleScientific reports2025
Documenting six decades of change in herpetofauna occurrence patterns in a mountain ecosystem.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-quality distribution data are essential for conservation planning but, are often scarce for mountain ecosystems. We integrated six decades of published and unpublished distribution records of herpetofauna from a mountain national park in Romania, and assessed the spatiotemporal patterns in species occurrences and consequent challenges for conservation. The number of records significantly differed from the expected values, based on the proportion of the area of altitudinal domains. We documented species richness, ranges and habitat changes across the park. Richness was lower in peripheral regions, with stable or expanding populations concentrated in the integral protection zone and the northwestern part of the buffer zone. Declines of introduced trout from alpine lakes facilitated recolonization by amphibians, while man-made structures, the spread of other species (e.g. Bufo bufo, Podarcis muralis, Zootoca vivipara). We emphasize the need for robust monitoring programs for herpetofauna in mountain habitats, to reduce biases and accurately assess, understand, and predict the dynamics of species distributions. While the park is still well-preserved, the creation and restoration of aquatic habitats are recommended to support amphibian populations. Targeted conservation measures are vital to mitigate the impact of man-made structures and tourism in the more accessible areas that overlap amphibian and reptile hotspots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.