Trial reportScientific reports2025
Capnography-detected respiratory depression during procedural sedation with remimazolam versus propofol: a randomised trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has gained attention for its favourable safety profile, particularly its reduced risk of respiratory depression compared to propofol during procedural sedation. However, previous studies have primarily relied on visual assessment or pulse oximetry, which may underestimate the incidence of respiratory compromise. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared the respiratory effects of remimazolam and propofol using continuous capnography monitoring, a more sensitive method for detecting hypoventilation and apnoea. Seventy adult patients undergoing procedural sedation were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam with remifentanil or propofol with remifentanil. The primary outcome was the frequency of respiratory depression events during sedation. The median [IQR] number of respiratory depression episodes was comparable between the remimazolam and propofol groups (2 [1-3] vs. 2 [1-5], p = 0.44). Respiratory polygraphy showed no significant difference in sleep apnoea severity between groups. However, the propofol group experienced more frequent hypotensive episodes and greater blood pressure reductions. These results suggest that remimazolam does not significantly reduce the incidence of respiratory depression compared to propofol under continuous capnographic monitoring, but it may offer advantages in haemodynamic stability. Our findings support the consideration of remimazolam as a safer alternative in patients at risk of hypotension during procedural sedation.Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry of Korea on December 2, 2021 (KCT0006797, https//cris.nih.go.kr principal investigator Suk Young Lee).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.