ArticleScientific reports2025
Brain benefits of deep learning-based noise management in experienced hearing aid users using functional near infrared spectroscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cortical activation during auditory working memory varies with hearing aid use status in age-related hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Electromyographic responses of the auriculomotor system during effortful listening in hearing aid users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Hearing Aids Reshape Neural Processing of Emotional Speech Without Improving Emotion Perception.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing interest in using neuroimaging to understanding listening effort in individuals with hearing loss, with a particular focus on how innovative hearing aid features impact listening effort. This study used functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to investigate the neural basis of listening effort in experienced hearing aid users. This study evaluated the impact of a new deep learning-based noise management hearing aid feature on cerebral blood oxygenation, with the expectation that it would be associated with less oxygenation in the left prefrontal cortex compared to a standard quiet-listening hearing aid program. Twenty-six experienced hearing aid users repeated sentence-final words from sentences presented in noise while wearing individually prescribed hearing aids in two conditions: a standard-listening program with an omnidirectional microphone setting and a DNN-listening program combining directional microphones with a deep-neural-network-based noise management algorithm. Listening accuracy, subjective listening effort ratings, and prefrontal oxygenation via fNIRS were measured throughout testing. As expected, the DNN-listening program was associated with higher listening accuracy, lower subjective listening effort ratings, and lower fNIRS-measured oxygenation in the left prefrontal cortex relative to the standard-listening program. The utility of fNIRS for hearing aid research and the interaction of listening effort and other cognitive processes are discussed further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.