ArticleScientific reports2025
Understanding perceived ride safety and trust formation in robotaxi services under day and night conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates how passengers perceive ride safety and develop trust in Robotaxi services in the absence of human drivers, with a focus on differences between daytime and nighttime scenarios. Drawing on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), we examined central cues (system transparency, perceived ride control) and peripheral cues (brand reputation, in-vehicle comfort) influencing safety perception and trust. Based on data from 563 real-world users, results show that all four cues significantly enhance perceived ride safety, which in turn fosters user trust. Notably, nighttime users relied more on perceived ride control and brand reputation, while daytime users prioritized in-vehicle comfort. System transparency remained a consistently strong predictor across both settings. The trust pathway from perceived safety proved stable regardless of time context. Theoretically, this study extends ELM to autonomous mobility, clarifying the roles of central and peripheral cues in real-world use. Practically, it offers targeted recommendations: enhance perceived control and brand safety at night, improve cabin comfort during the day, and ensure high system transparency at all times. These findings support broader acceptance and sustainable consumption of Robotaxi services, contributing to safer and more inclusive urban mobility systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.