Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290799›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Understanding perceived ride safety and trust formation in robotaxi services under day and night conditions.

YuanXiong Liu, Hanxi Li, Younghwan Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

YuanXiong LiuChina-Korea International Institute of Visual Arts Research, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong Province, China.
Hanxi LiSmart Experience Design Department, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, 77 Jeongneung-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, Korea.
Younghwan PanSmart Experience Design Department, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, 77 Jeongneung-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, Korea. peterpan@kookmin.ac.kr.

Funding

Qingdao University of Science and Technology WST2021020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how passengers perceive ride safety and develop trust in Robotaxi services in the absence of human drivers, with a focus on differences between daytime and nighttime scenarios. Drawing on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), we examined central cues (system transparency, perceived ride control) and peripheral cues (brand reputation, in-vehicle comfort) influencing safety perception and trust. Based on data from 563 real-world users, results show that all four cues significantly enhance perceived ride safety, which in turn fosters user trust. Notably, nighttime users relied more on perceived ride control and brand reputation, while daytime users prioritized in-vehicle comfort. System transparency remained a consistently strong predictor across both settings. The trust pathway from perceived safety proved stable regardless of time context. Theoretically, this study extends ELM to autonomous mobility, clarifying the roles of central and peripheral cues in real-world use. Practically, it offers targeted recommendations: enhance perceived control and brand safety at night, improve cabin comfort during the day, and ensure high system transparency at all times. These findings support broader acceptance and sustainable consumption of Robotaxi services, contributing to safer and more inclusive urban mobility systems.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingRoboticsSafetyTrustAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionYoung AdultElaboration likelihood modelPerceived ride safetyRobotaxiSmart mobility servicesSustainable consumptionUser trust

Identifiers

PMID41290799
PMCPMC12647839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.