ArticleScientific reports2025
Design, manufacturing, and testing of 3D-printed fittings for ergonomic helmet CPAP devices: a case study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents the design, optimisation, and experimental evaluation of additively manufactured fittings for a custom helmet continuous positive airway pressure (hCPAP) system. The project was initiated as a rapid response to the shortage of respiratory support equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. The inlet and outlet connectors of the helmet were redesigned to comply with the EN ISO 5356-1:2015 standard, reduce mass, and simplify assembly, while ensuring functional reliability and patient comfort. Components were fabricated using fused filament fabrication (FFF) and selective laser sintering (SLS) with medical-grade ABS, TPU-95A, and PA 2200 materials. A comprehensive assessment of material safety was performed, including tests for potential particle detachment under high-flow air conditions. Results confirmed that ABS Medical printed without active cooling exhibited no measurable release of microplastic particles, making it the preferred material for oxygen pathway components. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses guided the optimisation of the internal diffuser geometry, leading to improved air distribution and reduced perceived noise. The redesigned helmet system was evaluated in clinical trials involving 120 participants, demonstrating good ergonomic performance, low noise levels, and high user comfort. The findings validate additive manufacturing as a practical and reliable method for the small-batch production of medical fittings, particularly under emergency or resource-limited conditions. The proposed design approach highlights the potential of 3D printing to enable flexible, localised, and rapid development of medical devices adapted to current clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.