Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290781›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Personality traits measured by the HEXACO personality inventory and the dark triad predict university students' attitudes and misconduct behaviors related to generative artificial intelligence : Haiying Liang

Haiying Liang, Xu Mao, Michael J Reiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haiying LiangSchool of Foreign Languages, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8601-3763
Xu MaoSchool of Health Humanities, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2461-5697
Michael J ReissInstitute of Education, University College London, London, UK. m.reiss@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1207-4229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how personality traits, specifically those measured by the HEXACO Personality Inventory and the Dark Triad, predict university students' attitudes toward generative artificial intelligence (GAI) and their engagement in GAI-related academic misconduct. The first objective was to develop and validate a Chinese-language scale to measure students' attitudes toward GAI in academic contexts. The newly developed GAI Attitudes Scale was tested for psychometric properties, showing high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92) and reliability. In the second part of the study, hierarchical linear regression analyses explored the relationship between personality traits and both GAI attitudes and misconduct behaviors. Findings indicated that Extraversion and Openness to Experience were significant positive predictors of favorable GAI attitudes. Regarding misconduct behaviors, Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness were significant negative predictors, while Narcissism and Psychopathy were significant positive predictors. Notably, GAI attitudes did not provide additional predictive value for misconduct beyond personality traits. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that personality traits are central to understanding both the adoption and misuse of GAI in academic contexts, providing important insights for fostering ethical engagement with emerging technologies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttitudePersonalityPersonality InventoryStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41290781
PMCPMC12647770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.