ArticleScientific reports2025
Immunogenicity and safety in animals of a lyophilized live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine following stabilizer optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety profiles of lyophilized hepatitis A live attenuated vaccine (L-A-1 attenuated strain) after stabilizer formula optimization using non-human primates and various rodent models. Immunogenicity assessment was conducted using NIH mice and rhesus monkeys comparing pre-optimization commercial vaccine with post-optimization test vaccine. Mice received single immunizations with cardiac blood collection at day 28 for ELISA-based hepatitis A antibody detection. Non-human primates were monitored for clinical status, body weight, and hepatitis A virus IgG antibody titers at baseline(D0) and post-immunization timepoints (D14, D21, D28). Safety evaluation included guinea pig systemic anaphylaxis testing, rabbit subcutaneous irritation assessment, and rat single-dose toxicity investigation using both vaccine formulations and their corresponding stabilizer components. Both mouse and non-human primate studies demonstrated equivalent immunogenicity between optimized and commercial vaccines, with 100% seroconversion rates and comparable antibody concentrations (GMCs: 390.52 vs. 388.25 mIU/ml in mice, p > 0.05). Non-human primates showed 16-256 fold antibody titer increases by day 28 with normal clinical status maintained throughout. Safety assessments revealed no systemic sensitization, local irritation, or toxicity in any animal model for both formulations and their corresponding stabilizer components. Comprehensive animal model investigations demonstrate that the optimized stabilizer formulation maintains equivalent immunogenic potency while establishing a favorable safety profile comparable to the pre-optimization formulation. These findings provide substantive preclinical evidence supporting the feasibility and benefits of the stabilizer formula optimization strategy for lyophilized hepatitis A live attenuated vaccine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.