Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Towards an RGB camera-based live repetition counter using auto correlation with action recognition for home rehabilitation.

Amanpreet Chander, Chirag Singhal, Ashish Kumar Sahani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanpreet ChanderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, 140001, India. aman.chander86@gmail.com.
Chirag SinghalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, 140001, India.
Ashish Kumar SahaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, 140001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients recovering from stroke often struggle with their rehabilitation exercises at home, with personal therapists being both costly and potentially unavailable. Virtual rehabilitation programs may assist the patients by providing quantitative and qualitative feedback. The critical step for these automated systems is identifying and segmenting the performed activities for repetitions, making repetition counting an essential component. For this, an affordable, robust and generalized system is required. Previous works utilize expensive systems like Vicon and Kinect (discontinued), or require extensive training and are incapable of live counting. In this study, we propose a live repetition counter that works on RGB videos with Mediapipe, used for joint extraction. Also, we utilized action recognition (12 activities) using a lightweight transformer-based model. We employed a four-axis variance mechanism to monitor the motion across any arbitrary axis combined with the autocorrelation method to identify repetitions across random patterns. Our system was evaluated on a custom RGB dataset as well as the benchmark datasets UI-PRMD and KIMORE, achieving mean MAE values of 3.2733 and 1.4467, respectively, along with real-time validation through preliminary experiments. For activity recognition, the model achieved F1-score value up to 0.996. Relying solely on the RGB camera, our approach ensures practicality for home rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyStroke RehabilitationVideo RecordingAlgorithmsHumansActivity recognitionArtificial intelligenceAutocorrelationLive counterMachine learningReal-timeRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41290752
PMCPMC12647769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.