ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of tuna species used by the Portuguese canning industry through a DNA-based approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the popularity of canned tuna in Portugal, limited research has explored how tuna species vary across brands and seasons. Accurate species identification is crucial to preserve both the economy and ecology of global tuna fisheries, as mislabelling and the use of certain species can have far-reaching implications. Our study analysed the diversity of tuna species used by the Portuguese tuna canning industry, focusing on brand-specific and seasonal variations, using molecular barcoding methods. In this industry, the occurrence of different species was observed only in products using water as a preservation medium. Skipjack tuna was predominant across all preservation media and brands analysed. Nonetheless, other species like Thunnus obesus and T. albacares, or Auxis spp. (not considered true tuna) were also detected. The use of different species was limited to cans produced during the second quarter of the year, which could reflect differences in seasonal availability of different tuna species or in sourcing strategies/market preferences of each company. Finally, more than one species was detected inside the same container in four brands, violating current European legislation. These results provide the first broad assessment of species used in the Portuguese tuna canning industry and showed the inclusion of vulnerable species is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.