Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Cervical image visualization and improvement for clinical support in diagnosis and treatment.

Van Tien Tran, Thanh Hai Pham, Ngoc Khuong Cat Phan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Van Tien TranFaculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet Street, Dien Hong Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. tranvantien@hcmut.edu.vn.
Thanh Hai PhamTu Du Hospital, 284 Cong Quynh Street, Ben Thanh Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Ngoc Khuong Cat PhanFaculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), 268 Ly Thuong Kiet Street, Dien Hong Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical white light imaging (CWLI) plays a key role in diagnosing and managing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) but is limited by uneven illumination, low contrast, and specular reflections. Cervical image visualization and improvement (CIVI) is designed to improve contrast and uniform brightness while maintaining the histological accuracy of colposcopic images to clearly identify tissue differences. CIVI combines multiple image enhancement techniques, including specular reflection removal, illumination correction, and local contrast enhancement, in a unified framework. This technique was validated on 52 histologically confirmed CWLI images (CIN 1-3). We performed a Local Binary Pattern (LBP) analysis to extract cervical epithelial texture features and quantified blood contrast using the Michelson contrast (MC). A qualitative assessment was conducted by five expert colposcopists using a four-level scale. The mean LBP distance between lesion and normal tissue showed a marked increase from 0.192 to 0.391. The mean MC for blood area and surrounding tissue improved from 0.216 to 0.290. Experts observed an improvement in image quality for all CIN grades, with an average score increase of + 0.71. These initial experimental results demonstrate the potential of the proposed framework to enhance the visualization of CIN, support better treatment decisions, and enable more personalized care.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriColposcopyUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBlood vesselsCervical imagingCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaColposcopySpecular reflection removalTexture

Identifiers

PMID41290748
PMCPMC12647207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.