ArticleScientific reports2025
Cervical image visualization and improvement for clinical support in diagnosis and treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical white light imaging (CWLI) plays a key role in diagnosing and managing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) but is limited by uneven illumination, low contrast, and specular reflections. Cervical image visualization and improvement (CIVI) is designed to improve contrast and uniform brightness while maintaining the histological accuracy of colposcopic images to clearly identify tissue differences. CIVI combines multiple image enhancement techniques, including specular reflection removal, illumination correction, and local contrast enhancement, in a unified framework. This technique was validated on 52 histologically confirmed CWLI images (CIN 1-3). We performed a Local Binary Pattern (LBP) analysis to extract cervical epithelial texture features and quantified blood contrast using the Michelson contrast (MC). A qualitative assessment was conducted by five expert colposcopists using a four-level scale. The mean LBP distance between lesion and normal tissue showed a marked increase from 0.192 to 0.391. The mean MC for blood area and surrounding tissue improved from 0.216 to 0.290. Experts observed an improvement in image quality for all CIN grades, with an average score increase of + 0.71. These initial experimental results demonstrate the potential of the proposed framework to enhance the visualization of CIN, support better treatment decisions, and enable more personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.