ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning framework for automated frame selection in kidney ultrasound.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From intelligent models to clinical tools: the evolving landscape of AI in medical imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manual selection of optimal frames from kidney ultrasound videos is a time-consuming and subjective process that can introduce variability into clinical assessments. This study presents a fully automated deep learning-based framework designed to identify the most diagnostically informative frames, thereby enhancing the efficiency and consistency of kidney ultrasound interpretation. A curated dataset of 1,203 frames from 211 patients was constructed and annotated by clinical experts into three quality-based categories: Good, Bad, and Null. Multiple convolutional neural network models-including InceptionV3, ResNet34/50, EfficientNet, VGG16, YOLOv8x-cls and YOLO11x-cls-were trained and systematically compared for the task of frame classification. The YOLO11x-cls model, optimized using multi-class cross-entropy loss and evaluated through 5-fold patient-level cross-validation, consistently outperformed the baseline architectures. It achieved perfect classification metrics (F1-score of 100%) on the Good class. Additionally, YOLO11x-cls attained the highest average cross-validation accuracy (90%) with minimal performance variance across folds. These results highlight the potential of the proposed YOLO-based pipeline as a robust and efficient solution for automated best-frame selection in kidney ultrasound imaging. The method holds promise for integration into clinical workflows, where it can reduce manual effort and improve diagnostic reliability and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.