ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
One year follow up of phase 1/2 randomized, placebo controlled trial of NDV-HXP-S vaccine in Thailand.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To promote self-reliance in vaccine production, a chimeric Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) based vaccine (NDV-HXP-S) was developed in Bangkok, Thailand, with the support of PATH. The interim results of phase 1 on initial safety and immune responses of five formulations: 1 µg, 3 µg, 10 µg, 1 µg+ CpG, and 3 µg+CpG adjuvant were reported. The 3 µg and 3 µg+CpG formulations were selected to advance into phase 2. The full one-year follow-up of safety and immune responses of the NDV-HXP-S vaccine from a pooled phase 1/2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in vaccine naïve individuals with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported here. The two-dose NDV-HPX-S primary series was safe and elicited a strong immune response over one year, especially in the 3 µg+CpG and 10 µg groups. The 3 µg+CpG group had a significantly higher geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) than the 3 µg group (57.1 vs 40.0, p = 0.028) 14 days after the second dose.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.