Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290662›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Ecological similarities and dissimilarities between donor and recipient regions shape global plant naturalizations.

Shu-Ya Fan, Trevor S Fristoe, Shao-Peng Li, Patrick Weigelt, Holger Kreft, Wayne Dawson, Marten Winter, Petr Pyšek, Jan Pergl, Franz Essl and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shu-Ya FanResearch Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting, Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Zhejiang Zhoushan Island Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3747-8572
Trevor S FristoeDepartment of Biology, University of Puerto Rico - Río Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Shao-Peng LiResearch Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting, Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Zhejiang Zhoushan Island Ecosystem Observation and Research Station, Institute of Eco-Chongming, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. spli@des.ecnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1730-3433
Patrick WeigeltDepartment of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2485-3708
Holger KreftBiodiversity, Macroecology & Biogeography, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-8236
Wayne DawsonDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-0774
Marten WinterGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9593-7300
Petr PyšekDepartment of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8500-442X
Jan PerglDepartment of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Průhonice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-1974
Franz EsslDivision of Bioinvasions, Global Change & Macroecology, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Amy J S DavisEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6178-1734
Mark van KleunenEcology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-3701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in ecology is why alien species naturalize successfully in some regions but not in others. While some hypotheses suggest aliens are more likely to naturalize in environments similar to donor regions, others suggest they thrive in regions where certain characteristics are different. Using the native (i.e., donor) and recipient distributions of 11,604 naturalized alien plant species across 650 regions globally, we assess whether plants are more likely to naturalize in regions that are ecologically similar or dissimilar to their donor regions. Our results show that species are more likely to naturalize in recipient regions where climates are similar and native floras are phylogenetically similar to those of their donor regions, indicating that pre-adaptation to familiar biotic and abiotic conditions facilitates naturalization. However, naturalization is also more likely in regions with lower native flora diversity and more intense human modification than in the species' native range. Among all predictors, climate similarity and difference in native flora diversity emerge as the strongest predictors of naturalization success. In conclusion, ecological similarity in some factors but dissimilarity in others between donor and recipient regions promote the naturalization of alien plants and contribute to their uneven global distribution patterns.

Indexed as

EcosystemIntroduced SpeciesPlantsBiodiversityClimatePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID41290662
PMCPMC12647834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.