Trial reportNature communications2025
Pharmacogenomics and chronotherapy of drug-induced cardioprotection in acute myocardial infarction.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01311700 (Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion. The ME"Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion"), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion. The ME"Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion" (METOCARD-CNIC): A Randomized, Controlled Parallel-group, Observer-blinded Clinical Trial of Early Pre-reperfusion Metoprolol Administration in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial infarctionTOCARD-CNIC Trial.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of FunctionalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Circadian control of immune homeostasis in cardiovascular health and disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pharmacogenetic and chronotherapeutic approaches are increasingly applied to optimize therapy in chronic cardiovascular diseases. While gene variants are known to influence long-term drug efficacy, their role in modulating drug-induced cardioprotection in acute conditions such as myocardial infarction is unclear. Similarly, the impact of circadian timing on cardioprotective responses remains insufficiently defined. To address these questions, we evaluated metoprolol as a model cardioprotective agent. Here we examine, in a non-pre-specified exploratory analysis of the METOCARD-CNIC trial (NCT01311700), the influence of ADRB1 Arg389Gly polymorphism and the time of AMI onset on metoprolol efficacy. We found that metoprolol reduced infarct size only in patients homozygous for the ADRB1 Arg389 allele, consistent with its genotype-dependent inhibition of neutrophil migration. In-silico docking and binding studies revealed unstable interactions of metoprolol with the Gly389 variant of ADRB1. Moreover, metoprolol was associated with reduced infarct size when AMI onset occurred between 6:00 and 12:00 h. Restricted cardioprotection to the light phase was confirmed in male mice and in neutrophil-specific Adrb1-knockout models. Collectively, these findings highlight the critical roles of genetic background and circadian timing in shaping the efficacy of acute cardioprotective therapies, supporting the rationale for personalized interventions in acute myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.