ArticleNature communications2025
Cancer-associated snaR-A noncoding RNA interacts with core splicing machinery and disrupts processing of mRNA subpopulations.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer-associated snaR-A noncoding RNA interacts with core splicing machinery and disrupts processing of mRNA subpopulations.Nature communications · 2025Article
- An RNA polymerase III tissue and tumor atlas uncovers context-specific activities linked to 3D epigenome regulatory mechanisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Expansion of RNA polymerase III (Pol III) activity in cancer can activate the transcription of typically silent small RNA genes, including snaR-A (small NF90-associated RNA isoform A), a hominid-specific noncoding RNA that promotes cell proliferation through unclear mechanisms. Here, we show that snaR-A interacts with mRNA splicing factors, including the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) subunit SF3B2, and localizes near subnuclear foci enriched in splicing machinery. Overexpression of snaR-A increases intron retention, a hallmark of inefficient splicing, whereas its depletion enhances splicing of mRNAs characterized by high U2 snRNP occupancy and nuclear speckle proximity. These improvements in splicing coincide with reduced cell proliferation, consistent with tumor-level patterns linking snaR-A to growth in primary cancers. Together, these findings identify snaR-A as a molecular antagonist of splicing and potential disease driver in cancer. We propose that snaR-A-related splicing perturbation may phenocopy splicing defects attributed to U2 snRNP mutations in cancer, eliciting an alternative, non-mutational mechanism of splicing dysregulation during tumorigenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.