ArticleEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2026
Utilization patterns and determinants of guideline-recommended therapies for acute heart failure in Denmark.
Article in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAcute heart failure (AHF) is a leading cause of frequent hospitalizations and poor outcomes. While chronic HF is treated with guideline-directed medical therapy, acute hospital care often requires loop diuretics, vasodilators, inotropes, and vasopressors. This study aimed to evaluate the inpatient use, dosing, and determinants of guideline-recommended therapies in patients hospitalized with AHF. METHODS AND
resultsThis nationwide, register-based cohort study included 6009 patients aged ≥45 years hospitalized with AHF with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤40% in Denmark from 2018 to 2023. Data from the Danish Heart Failure Registry were linked to national healthcare registers. The main outcomes were inpatient use and doses of loop diuretics, vasodilators, inotropes, and vasopressors. Loop diuretics were used in 88.7% of patients [median dose (MD) of furosemide: 50 mg parenteral, 40 mg oral]. Vasodilators were administered to 36.1% (MD of nitroglycerine: 30 mg parenteral, 7.5 mg oral). Inotropes were administered to 3.0%, including dopamine (0.5%), dobutamine (1.0%), milrinone (0.9%), and levosimendan (1.1%). Vasopressors were used in 8.4%, with norepinephrine (7.3%) and epinephrine (2.0%). Older patients (≥75) had lower prevalence of vasodilator, inotrope, and vasopressor use. Severe HF (LVEF < 25%) was associated with lower prevalence of vasodilator and vasopressor use. In contrast, chronic kidney disease and recurrent HF hospitalization were linked to higher prevalence of use of all AHF therapies.
conclusionLoop diuretics were widely used, while vasodilators, inotropes, and vasopressors had lower utilization. The observed variation in treatment reflects complexity of inpatient AHF management, warranting further studies to assess treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.