ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Multi-institutional study on the commissioning and clinical implementation of the TrueBeam enhanced leaf model in the Eclipse treatment planning system.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-institutional study of multileaf collimator parameters and dose calculation accuracy using the enhanced leaf model.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Multi-institutional study on the commissioning and clinical implementation of the TrueBeam enhanced leaf model in the Eclipse treatment planning system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRecently, the Enhanced Leaf Modeling (ELM) was developed to improve the multileaf collimator (MLC) model in the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). This multi-institutional study evaluated the dose calculation accuracy and clinical feasibility of the ELM for TrueBeam linear accelerators (linacs) equipped with Millennium 120 and High-Definition 120 MLCs. In addition, to facilitate broader clinical adoption, the feasibility of using machine-averaged ELMs (ELM
methodsTwelve TrueBeam linacs from nine institutions were included. Machine-specific ELM (ELM
resultsFor the ELM
conclusionsThe ELM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.