Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290356›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

The impact of off-centered positioning on cone beam CT image quality for image-guided brain SRS treatment.

Noor Mail, Fang Li, Ron Lalonde, M Saiful Huq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noor MailDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Fang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ron LalondeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
M Saiful HuqDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in image-guided positioning for patients with brain metastases during stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A major issue with CBCT is the decrease in image quality due to scatter, especially when the isocenter is off-centered for treating peripheral-metastases. This affects image clarity and CT numbers in skull-reconstruction. The study aims to measure the scatter-to-primary ratio in projection-images based on gantry-angle for off-centered isocenter. It also examines the effects of scatter on CBCT image quality and alignment-accuracy for off-centered isocenter. MATERIALS/

methodsA Catphan-600 phantom was imaged using the head protocol across five different FOV(2-18 cm in SI dimension) to analyze the effect of scatter on CBCT image quality in both centered and off-centered isocenter Positions. Scatter-fractions were measured for the Catphan-600 relative to Field of View (FOV) size and for a head-phantom in relation to gantry rotation at an off-centered isocenter. Computed tomography (CT) and CBCT images alignment of the head phantom was compared between centered and off-centered isocenter placements.

resultsIncreasing FOV from 2 to 18 cm significantly reduced image quality; the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) decreased by 1.7 times with this FOV increase. CNR decreased by 3 times at a 6 cm off-center position and the skull CT-number decreased by 350 HU. For the Catphan-600 at an 18 cm FOV, the scatter-to-primary ratio reached 0.67. The scatter-fraction for the head phantom was 1.8 times higher when fully in-field compared to partially in-field. The mean alignment accuracy for the head phantom was 0.3 ± 0.2 mm for isocenter and 0.8 ± 0.3 mm for off-center isocenter.

conclusionQuantitative analysis of CBCT image quality in phantoms reveals substantial image degradation with larger FOV and off-centered isocenter positioning. The methods in this study provide insights and a framework for refining scatter correction algorithms to achieve precise scatter adjustments. These developments can be used to enhance CBCT image quality and improve target-alignment-accuracy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCone-Beam Computed TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPatient PositioningPhantoms, ImagingRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedCBCTCranial metastasesImage‐quality and patient alignment‐accuracyOff‐centered‐Iso‐centerscatter‐to‐primary‐ratioSRS

Identifiers

PMID41290356
PMCPMC12646830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.