ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025
Large, prolonged flooding and pool persistence promote floodplain fish diversity in a threatened river.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large, prolonged flooding and pool persistence promote floodplain fish diversity in a threatened river.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While it is widely recognized that reduced river-floodplain connectivity has contributed to the decline of biodiversity in floodplain rivers, surprisingly few studies have quantified the relationship between connectivity, pool persistence, and fish assemblage structure to the level required to generate measurable targets for management. The task is further complicated by the inherent complexity of accurately describing fish assemblages. We maximized our capacity to describe unbiased hydrology-fish relationships by sampling fish assemblages in floodplain pools with a variety of connection histories (60 sampling events), and by using a hierarchical multispecies occupancy model that accounts for changes in sampling design and species detection. Our study was conducted in a tropical wet-dry river threatened by water resource development and elevated temperatures associated with climate change, the Fitzroy River (Western Australia). Our results revealed that wet season (river-floodplain connectivity) and dry season (pool persistence) components of the hydrological cycle influenced fish occurrence in floodplain pools. Pools that were connected to the river by short distances were substantially more species rich than distal pools. This effect was strong at distances <2000 m but negligible at distances greater than 3000 m. Species richness in floodplain pools increased when wet season connection to the river lasted more than 25 days, and when river stage height exceeded 6 m. Prolonged connection to the river (up to 90 days) during overbank flooding (river stage height >11 m) maximized fish species richness in floodplain pools. Dry season components of the hydrological cycle also influenced fish assemblage structure, with pools that persisted during the preceding dry season twice as species rich as those that dried. Our model revealed that sampling gear influenced species detectability, indicating that accounting for variable detection is critical when assessing fish assemblage structure. Given that large flood events are less likely to be impacted by water take, we recommend that managers seeking to maintain floodplain fish diversity ensure that water resource development does not negatively impact pool persistence during the dry season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.