Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290292›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Alternatives to incarceration for parents: a scoping review protocol.

Pajarita Charles, Jacqueline Buck, Justin Harty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pajarita CharlesSandra Rosenbaum School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA paja.charles@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-6148
Jacqueline BuckSandra Rosenbaum School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Justin HartySchool of Social Work, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe USA has the highest incarceration rate in the world, with 1 in 48 adults under correctional supervision. Approximately half of state and federal prisoners are parents, nearly 80% of women in jails are mothers, and an estimated 1 in 14 children have had an incarcerated parent. Incarceration increases the risk of physical and mental health issues, family strain and disconnection and housing and employment instability. Children of incarcerated parents are particularly vulnerable to health problems, behavioural issues and academic struggles. Given these impacts, there is growing interest in using strategies besides incarceration that address both community safety concerns and promote parental and family well-being. Efforts to keep people out of jail and prison most commonly include deflection (before arrest) and diversion or alternatives to incarceration (after arrest but before conviction, or after conviction but as an alternative to prison or jail). However, there is limited understanding of what is known about these approaches when used with parents and a lack of empirical evidence about their effectiveness. This scoping review aims to map concepts, document evidence and identify knowledge gaps about parent and caregiver-focused alternatives to incarceration in the USA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will characterise alternatives to incarceration across the criminal legal system for parents and caregivers and map existing concepts and research in the field. The review will be conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Five interfaces with one or more databases will be searched including EBSCOhost, ProQuest, Web of Science, PubMed, HeinOnline and SCOPUS, in addition to Google Scholar and Google. All available published articles and grey literature on US-based alternatives to incarceration for parents and caregivers (18+) will be considered. Two research team members will independently screen sources based on inclusion criteria and resolve any disagreements through discussion or a third reviewer if necessary. The findings will be charted, synthesised and reported. The study will be conducted from approximately November 2025 to August 2026. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review. The findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conference presentations and to policy and practice audiences. The results will help inform a research agenda aimed at improving the development, implementation and evaluation of parent-focused alternatives to incarceration in the USA. REGISTRATION: This protocol is registered with Open Science Framework registries (https://osf.io/39zn8).

Indexed as

ParentsPrisonersAdultChildFemaleHumansIncarcerationPrisonsResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicUnited StatesChildCrimeFamilyParentsPrisons

Identifiers

PMID41290292
PMCPMC12645624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.