ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Impact of survivorship stories on the interdisciplinary critical care team: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Narrative Medicine in Pediatric anti‑NMDA Receptor Encephalitis: A Mixed‑methods Evaluation of Triadic Outcomes Among Children, Parents, and Healthcare Providers.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceHealthcare providers (HCPs) working in intensive care units (ICUs) face high levels of stress, burnout and emotional exhaustion. There is limited research on interventions that foster resilience and connection among interdisciplinary ICU teams. Storytelling, particularly through ICU patient survivorship narratives, may offer a novel approach to improving team morale, reducing burnout and enhancing workplace belongingness.
objectivesTo explore the impact of ICU survivor stories on the interdisciplinary ICU team's perceptions of their role in survivorship, resilience, burnout and sense of belonging at work. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsThis qualitative study used a cross-sectional survey and focus group design at a large academic hospital. Participants included 39 members of the ICU interdisciplinary team who reviewed ICU survivor profiles and completed a survey. A subset of participants engaged in focus groups. ANALYSIS: Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended survey responses and focus group transcripts underwent thematic analysis using descriptive and in vivo coding, followed by consensus-based theme development.
resultsAll survey items had mean scores above 3.0, indicating overall agreement with the positive impact of the survivor profiles. Six key themes emerged from qualitative analysis: validation and closure, learning and growth, gratitude, team building and collaboration, burnout and sense of belonging. Participants reported that the profiles provided emotional closure, reinforced the value of their work and fostered interdisciplinary appreciation. Some participants noted disparities in recognition across disciplines, highlighting opportunities for more inclusive team-building strategies.
conclusionsICU survivor stories may serve as a meaningful intervention to support emotional well-being, reduce burnout and enhance team cohesion among critical care providers. These narratives offer a humanising perspective on patient recovery and may help staff reconnect with the purpose behind their work. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such interventions and their potential to improve both provider well-being and patient care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.