Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290225›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Prioritising research on endocrine disruption in the marine environment: a global perspective.

Patricia I S Pinto, Angelica Miglioli, Carlie A LaLone, Lisa Baumann, Alice Baynes, Mélanie Blanc-Legendre, Ibon Cancio, Xavier Cousin, ZhiChao Dang, Rémi Dumollard and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Patricia I S PintoCentro de Ciências do Mar do Algarve (CCMAR/CIMAR LA), Campus de Gambelas, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, 8005-139, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7854-3898
Angelica MiglioliInstitut de la Mer de Villefranche sur Mer (IMEV), Laboratoire Océanologique de Villefranche, 181 Chemin du Lazaret, Villefranche sur Mer, 06230, France.
Carlie A LaLoneUS Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), Great-Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, Duluth, 55804, MN, USA.
Lisa BaumannAmsterdam Institute for Life and Environment, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands.
Alice BaynesEnvironmental Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6337-5956
Mélanie Blanc-LegendreMARBEC (MARine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation), Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, INRAE, Palavas-Les-Flots, 34250, France.
Ibon CancioPlentzia Marine Station (PiE-UPV/EHU) University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Areatza 47, Plentzia, 48620, Basque Country, Spain.
Xavier CousinMARBEC (MARine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation), Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, INRAE, Palavas-Les-Flots, 34250, France.
ZhiChao DangNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), PO Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands.
Rémi DumollardInstitut de la Mer de Villefranche sur Mer (IMEV), Laboratoire Océanologique de Villefranche, 181 Chemin du Lazaret, Villefranche sur Mer, 06230, France.
Alex T FordInstitute of Marine Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 9LY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5202-546X
Christopher GreenDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), 2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF, UK.
Taisen IguchiYokohama City University (YCU), Seto 22-2, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0027, Kanagawa, Japan.
Philippa KearneyDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), 2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF, UK.
Thomas KniggeEnvironmental Stress and Aquatic Biomonitoring (SEBIO), Université Le Havre-Normandie, Le Havre, 76600, France.
Christophe MinierEnvironmental Stress and Aquatic Biomonitoring (SEBIO), Université Le Havre-Normandie, Le Havre, 76600, France.
Tiphaine MonsinjonEnvironmental Stress and Aquatic Biomonitoring (SEBIO), Université Le Havre-Normandie, Le Havre, 76600, France.
Marta S MonteiroCESAM & Departamento de Biologia, Universidade de Aveiro, Campus de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1891-7365
Joachim SturveDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Medicinaregatan 7 B, Gothenburg, 41390, Sweden.
Haruna WatanabeNational Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.
Hiroshi YamamotoNational Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan.
Gerald AnkleyDepartment of Biology, University of Minnesota-Duluth, 1049 University Drive, Duluth, 55812, MN, USA.
Deborah M PowerCentro de Ciências do Mar do Algarve (CCMAR/CIMAR LA), Campus de Gambelas, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, 8005-139, Portugal.
Ioanna KatsiadakiCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Weymouth Laboratory, Dorset, DT4 8UB, UK.

Funding

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government C8378Euromarine EM/PFB/2019.048Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia DL57/2016/CP1361/CT0015Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia LA/P/0094/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia LA/P/0101/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04326/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/50017/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/PRR/04326/2025Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades IT1743-22Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2023-146085NB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A healthy ocean is a crucial life support system that regulates the global climate, is a source of oxygen and supports major economic activities. A vast and understudied biodiversity from micro- to macro-organisms is integral to ocean health. However, the impact of pollutants that reach the ocean daily is understudied for marine taxa, which are also absent or poorly represented in regulatory test guidelines for chemical hazard assessment. Inspired by the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science, which aims to reverse the decline in ocean health, this communication calls for global coordination in building resources for studying the effects of marine pollution. The bibliographic analysis, a collective product of scientists from diverse backgrounds, focused on endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). In this review, we (i) critically analyse the literature on endocrine signalling pathways and high-level physiological impacts of EDCs across 20 representative marine taxa; (ii) identify knowledge and regulatory gaps; (iii) apply bioinformatics approaches to marine species genomic resources, with relevance for predictions of susceptibility; and (iv) provide recommendations of priority actions for different stakeholders. We reveal that the scientific literature on EDCs is biased towards terrestrial and/or freshwater organisms, is limited to a handful of animal taxa, and marine organisms are dramatically underrepresented. Our bibliographic analysis also confirmed that only a small number of (neuro) endocrine pathways are covered for all animals, whilst basic knowledge on endocrine systems/endocrine disruption for most marine invertebrate phyla is minimal. Despite significant gaps in genomic resources for marine animals, endocrine-related protein conservation was evident across more than 500 species from diverse marine taxa, highlighting that they are at risk from EDCs. Despite recent technological advances, translation of existing knowledge into international regulatory test guidelines for chemical hazard assessment and monitoring programs is limited. Furthermore, the current understanding is confounded in part by transposing vertebrate endocrinology onto non-vertebrate taxa. In this context, specific recommendations are provided for all stakeholders, including academia (e.g. to expand knowledge across metazoan taxa and endocrine targets and translate it to New Approach Methodologies and Adverse Outcome Pathways; to increase and improve tools for comparative species-sensitivity distributions and cross-species extrapolations), regulators (e.g. increase awareness of specific risks for the marine environment, prioritise international standardisation of testing methods for marine species and request evidence for absence of endocrine disruption in marine phyla), policy makers (e.g. implement sustained, long-term international marine monitoring programs and increase global co-operation) and the public or non-governmental organisations (e.g. foster public engagement and behaviours that prevent marine chemical pollution; promote citizen science activities; and drive political actions towards protective and restorative marine policies). We hope that this and past reviews can contribute towards meeting ambitious international plans for marine water quality assurance, mitigation of marine pollution impacts and protection of marine biodiversity. The importance of marine biodiversity for climate change mitigation, food security and sustainable ecosystem services calls for urgent, cooperative action.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsEndocrine DisruptorsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsOceans and SeasEndocrine DisruptorsWater Pollutants, Chemicaladverse outcome pathwaysbiodiversitychemical pollutionendocrine‐disrupting chemicalsmarinemarine organismsmonitoringnew approach methodologiesnext‐generation risk assessmentocean health

Identifiers

PMID41290225
PMCPMC12965855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.