ReviewThe Journal of parasitology2025
REVIEW: THE ORIGIN OF DIGENETIC TREMATODES: DID THE STORY BEGIN WITH THE BLOOD FLUKES?
Review in The Journal of parasitology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Building on other scholars' relatively recent insights of the relationships of polyopisthocotyleans and trematodes, here for the first time it is hypothesized that this relationship favors the view that blood flukes are the primordial digeneans, and blood feeding per se was a factor facilitating the transition to endoparasitism. In contrast to other hypotheses of digenean origins that are "mollusc first" and then suggest acquisition of the vertebrate host secondarily, this is a "vertebrate first" hypothesis that features later capture of molluscan or annelid hosts. Capture of molluscan or annelid hosts may have been facilitated by their possession of hemoglobin. This hypothesis is also distinctive in suggesting that the 2-host blood fluke life cycle is not secondarily truncated but in fact represents the basal condition and, furthermore, provides a platform from which 3-host life cycles could emerge. The hypothesis is supported by long-standing observations that early diverging blood flukes tend to appear in early diverging vertebrate host lineages, blood fluke intermediate hosts and intramolluscan larval stages are exceptionally diverse, and blood flukes exhibit cercariae with tails ranging from simple buds to complex forked swimming structures. These ideas have nonetheless heretofore never been gathered into an explicit statement hypothesizing the early divergence of blood flukes, manifested today in definitive hosts ranging from early diverging fish lineages to birds and mammals, a host breadth unparalleled among other digenean groups. This hypothesis supports the sister group relationships of aspidogastreans and digeneans, but unlike others it does not posit a major role for aspidogastrean-like organisms giving rise to primordial digeneans. It also points out problems in concluding that some digenean groups such as brachylaimids or transversotrematids are basal digeneans. This review also considers how the complex intramolluscan asexual reproduction program of digeneans may have arisen, based on new insights from functional genomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.