Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41290182›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025

Gooey stuff: the psychophysics of unpleasantness in response to touching liquids.

Müge Cavdan, Maja Fehlberg, Roland Bennewitz, Knut Drewing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Müge CavdanJustus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3575-3849
Maja FehlbergINM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Roland BennewitzINM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-8190
Knut DrewingJustus Liebig University Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftVolkswagen Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing scientific interest in material unpleasantness, yet the role of distinct physical parameters in perceptual and affective haptic experiences with liquids remains to be fully understood. To address this, we investigated how perceptual qualities of liquids relate to measurable physical properties and unpleasantness during active touch. We prepared 15 custom liquid samples using everyday materials. Rheological measurements showed that samples varied between physical viscosity [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Participants explored each sample using circular rubbing motions with their index fingers. A camera system tracked finger movements, and a force sensor revealed applied normal forces, pull-off force (PoF) and the coefficient of friction (CoF). We compared these physical properties with the perceptual dimensions from our earlier work: perceived viscosity and slipperiness. Perceived viscosity correlated strongly with both physical viscosity and PoF, but not with CoF. Conversely, perceived slipperiness was associated with CoF, but not PoF or physical viscosity, demonstrating distinct links between physics and perception of liquids. Interestingly, PoF but not CoF was significantly linked to unpleasantness, suggesting that PoF but not CoF is crucial for liquid unpleasantness. These findings advance our understanding of how distinct physical properties relate to perceptual and affective experiences of liquids.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionAdultFemaleFingersFrictionHumansMalePsychophysicsRheologyViscosityYoung Adulthaptic perceptionliquiditymaterial perceptionunpleasantnessviscosity

Identifiers

PMID41290182
PMCPMC12646788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.