ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Gooey stuff: the psychophysics of unpleasantness in response to touching liquids.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gooey stuff: the psychophysics of unpleasantness in response to touching liquids.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a growing scientific interest in material unpleasantness, yet the role of distinct physical parameters in perceptual and affective haptic experiences with liquids remains to be fully understood. To address this, we investigated how perceptual qualities of liquids relate to measurable physical properties and unpleasantness during active touch. We prepared 15 custom liquid samples using everyday materials. Rheological measurements showed that samples varied between physical viscosity [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. Participants explored each sample using circular rubbing motions with their index fingers. A camera system tracked finger movements, and a force sensor revealed applied normal forces, pull-off force (PoF) and the coefficient of friction (CoF). We compared these physical properties with the perceptual dimensions from our earlier work: perceived viscosity and slipperiness. Perceived viscosity correlated strongly with both physical viscosity and PoF, but not with CoF. Conversely, perceived slipperiness was associated with CoF, but not PoF or physical viscosity, demonstrating distinct links between physics and perception of liquids. Interestingly, PoF but not CoF was significantly linked to unpleasantness, suggesting that PoF but not CoF is crucial for liquid unpleasantness. These findings advance our understanding of how distinct physical properties relate to perceptual and affective experiences of liquids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.