ArticleBiology letters2025
Allometry and phylogeny of within-diaspore biomass allocation: A global analysis.
Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Allometry and phylogeny of within-diaspore biomass allocation: A global analysis.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allometry, the study of size and its effects on biological traits, provides a quantitative and predictive framework for the evolution of plant allocation strategies. While most studies focus on scaling relationships between distinct structures (e.g., leaves, stems, and roots), the allometry within reproductive structures remains underexplored. Here, we assess the global scaling of biomass within diaspores. We take an ecological and evolutionary perspective to examine the interspecific and phylogenetic allometry of within-diaspore (e.g., seeds, fruit) biomass allocation in plants worldwide. We compiled data on seed mass, fruit mass, and seed dispersal mode (biotic versus abiotic) from open-access databases and the literature for 346 species across 97 families to investigate how diaspore biomass is allocated and then consider how this pattern might be influenced by (i) evolutionary history and (ii) seed dispersal mode. Our results reveal that seed mass scales isometrically with fruit mass. This pattern persists after accounting for phylogenetic relatedness and seed dispersal mode despite a notable trend towards differences in allometric coefficients among groups. Our findings suggest that isometric reproductive scaling is a conserved evolutionary pattern shaped by a combination of selective trade-offs, developmental constraints and historical dispersal syndromes. By integrating scaling theory with evolutionary perspectives, our study advances a predictive framework for understanding plant allometry and its role in shaping reproductive strategies across diverse lineages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.