ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
First- and second-order social contact network structure in southern China.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First- and second-order social contact network structure in southern China.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The contact network structure resulting from social interaction between people is a key aspect of epidemic dynamics and control. While many studies have measured first-order network characteristics such as degree, measuring higher order properties of these networks, such as clustering, remains a challenge. Here, we present the results of a study of first- and second-order network structure from a representative cohort of individuals in Guangdong province, China. The number of reported daily contacts is similar across individuals aged 2 to 55 years, except for young adults (ages 16-25) who have relatively fewer daily contacts, while the number of contacts declines with age above 55 years old. The association between age and contact rate persisted after adjusting for mediating factors. Individuals living in higher population density areas made more contacts outside the home than individuals in low-density areas. Contacts of young children and older adults were more locally clustered than middle-aged adults. Individuals living in high population density areas had lower levels of local clustering compared with individuals from low-density areas. Adjustment for characteristics of the contacts themselves reduces the variation in local clustering between participants of different ages; however, the strong association with population density remains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.