ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Usability, Benefits, and Barriers Associated With Patients' Access to Electronic Health Record-Integrated Telehealth in Hospitals in Riyadh: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) with telehealth platforms represents a transformative approach in health care, providing critical accessibility and engagement solutions, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Riyadh's hospitals, the adoption of EHR-integrated telehealth has significantly increased and offers enhanced patient care options. However, there is a need to examine its continued relevance, effectiveness, and challenges in a postpandemic context. Objective: This research aimed to qualitatively investigate the usability, perceived benefits, and barriers to patients' access to EHR-integrated telehealth from both patients and health care providers (HCPs) in a major Riyadh hospital. Methods: A qualitative research design was used, featuring semistructured interviews with 20 patients and 10 HCPs, selected through purposive sampling for their direct experience with EHR-integrated telehealth services at Sulaiman Al Habib Hospital in Riyadh. Thematic analysis, supported by NVivo 14 software, was used to analyze the transcriptions and extract themes related to usability, perceived benefits, and barriers. Results: The findings indicate that patients generally regard EHR-integrated telehealth positively, appreciating its navigability, convenience, and facilitation of remote health care interactions. Reported benefits included reduced physical visits, time savings, and more accessible follow-ups, contributing to greater continuity of care. However, significant barriers were identified, including technical challenges, lack of integration across hospital branches, absence of insurance payment linkages, and limited patient choice among providers. HCPs also expressed concerns over digital literacy gaps, the platform's limitations for specialized and complex care, and technical disruptions impacting care delivery. Conclusions: EHR-integrated telehealth offers substantial potential to improve health care delivery in Riyadh's hospitals by enhancing access, convenience, and patient engagement. However, maximizing these benefits in Saudi Arabia's evolving health care landscape requires addressing identified barriers, particularly in platform stability, interbranch integration, insurance linkages, and patient support resources. Findings are grounded in a single-hospital sample and are intended to inform improvements in similar hospital settings in Saudi Arabia rather than national generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.