Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41289298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Interventions to improve racial and ethnic equity in critical care: A scoping review.

Shirley Ge, Hope Lappen, Luz Mercado, Kaylee Lamarche, Theodore J Iwashyna, Catherine L Hough, Virginia W Chang, Adolfo Cuevas, Thomas S Valley, Mari Armstrong-Hough

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shirley GeAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8029-9319
Hope LappenDivision of Libraries, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Luz MercadoDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Kaylee LamarcheDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Theodore J IwashynaDepartments of Medicine and Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Catherine L HoughDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Virginia W ChangDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Adolfo CuevasDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Thomas S ValleyInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Mari Armstrong-HoughDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacial and ethnic disparities in the delivery and outcomes of critical care are well documented. However, interventions to mitigate these disparities are less well understood. We sought to review the current state of evidence for interventions to promote equity in critical care processes and patient outcomes.

methodsFour bibliographic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and Embase) and a list of core journals, conference abstracts, and clinical trial registries were queried with a pre-specified search strategy. We analyzed the content of interventions by categorizing each as single- or multi-component, extracting each intervention component during review, and grouping intervention components according to strategy to identify common approaches.

resultsThe search strategy yielded 11,509 studies. Seven-thousand seventeen duplicate studies were removed, leaving 4,491 studies for title and abstract screening. After screening, 93 studies were included for full-text review. After full-text review by two independent reviewers, eleven studies met eligibility criteria. We identified ten distinct intervention components under five broad categories: education, communication, standardization, restructuring, and outreach. Most examined effectiveness using pre-post or other non-randomized designs.

conclusionsDespite widespread recognition of disparities in critical care outcomes, few interventions have been evaluated to address disparities in the ICU. Many studies did not describe the rationale or targeted disparity mechanism for their intervention design. There is a need for randomized, controlled evaluations of interventions that target demonstrated mechanisms for disparities to promote equity in critical care.

Indexed as

Critical CareEthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityRacial GroupsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41289298
PMCPMC12646404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.