Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41289295›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Acceptability and perceived barriers to adoption of the core outcome set for maternal and neonatal health research and surveillance during emerging and ongoing epidemic threats (MNH-EPI-COS): An online survey.

Karen Klein, Juan Pedro Alonso, Mabel Berrueta, Olufemi T Oladapo, Mercedes Bonet, María Belizán, Verónica Pingray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen KleinDepartment of Maternal and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-5432
Juan Pedro AlonsoUnit of Qualitative Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mabel BerruetaDepartment of Maternal and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Olufemi T OladapoUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mercedes BonetUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
María BelizánUnit of Qualitative Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Verónica PingrayDepartment of Maternal and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-2825

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Maternal and Newborn Health Core Outcome Set during Epidemics (MNH-EPI-COS) is a standardized set of outcomes developed to harmonize outcome selection in maternal and neonatal health research conducted during outbreaks and epidemics. It was developed through a four-stage modified Delphi process involving a large group of international stakeholders who assessed outcomes relevance through online surveys, followed by consensus meetings with a subgroup of stakeholders to finalize the COS. The objective of this study is to evaluate the acceptability of the full MNH-EPI-COS among key stakeholders who participated in the first two round of the Delphi process, to identify anticipated barriers to its adoption, and to assess agreement on the inclusion of individual outcomes, their definitions, and the perceived feasibility of data collection. An online consultation was conducted using an electronic semi-structured survey targeting senior clinical and public health experts and civil society representatives who had contributed to earlier phases of MNH-EPI-COS development but did not participate in the final consensus meetings. Of the 118 invited stakeholders, 100 completed the survey. The majority (95%) agreed that the MNH-EPI-COS captures the most important outcomes, is likely acceptable to key stakeholders (94%), and facilitates timely evidence generation (92%). Additionally, 75% expressed intent to use it. Over 80% of participants agreed with the individual outcomes and their definitions, except for "skin-to-skin contact" and "breastfeeding," which were acceptable to 67% and 74%, respectively. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of measuring specific outcomes across diverse settings due to the substantial effort and resources required. Key barriers to adoption include knowledge, skills, and understanding gaps and the lack of practical resources. The MNH-EPI-COS, including its outcomes and definitions, was highly acceptable to the larger group of stakeholders involved in the early stages of its development. However, feasibility concerns remain. Successful implementation will require effective dissemination, targeted training, data collection resources, and real-world evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID41289295
PMCPMC12646480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.